ABSTRACT
Objectives: To develop and assess Pediatric AppropriatenessEvaluation Protocol for India (PAEP-India) for inter-rater reliabilityand appropriateness of hospitalization.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: The available PAEP tools were reviewed and adaptedfor Indian context by ten experienced pediatricians followingsemi-Delphi process. Two PAEP-India tools; newborn (?28 days)and children (>28 days-18 years) were developed. These PAEP-India tools were applied to cases to assess appropriateness ofadmission and inter-rater reliability between assessors.Participants: Two sets of case records were used: (i) 274cases from five medical colleges in Delhi-NCR [?28 days (n=51);>28 days to 18 years (n=223)]; (ii) 622 infants who werehospitalized in 146 health facilities and were part of a cohort (n=30688) from two southern Indian states.Interventions: Each case-record was evaluated by twopediatricians in a blinded manner using the appropriate PAEP-India tools, and ‘admission criteria’ were categorized asappropriate, inappropriate or indeterminate.Main outcome measures: The proportion of appropriatehospitalizations and inter-rater reliability between assessors(using kappa statistic) were estimated for the cases.Results: 97.8% hospitalized cases from medical colleges werelabelled as appropriate by both reviewers with inter-rateragreement of 98.9% (k=0.66). In the southerm Indian set ofinfants, both reviewers labelled 80.5% admissions as appropriatewith inter-rater agreement of 96.1% (k= 0.89).Conclusions: PAEP-India (newborn and child) tools are simple,objective and applicable in diverse settings and highly reliable.These tools can potentially be used for deciding admissionappropriateness and hospital stay and may be evaluated later forusefulness for cost reimbursements for insurance proposes.